|
Duration: 05:45 minutes
Upload Time: 2006-12-13 06:43:40
User: DangerousTalk
:::: Favorites
:::: Top Videos of Day
|
Description:
Response to a response
|
Comments |
DangerousTalk ::: Favorites 2007-02-13 20:28:33
I rewatched my video, don't see a problem with it. This isn't a case of post hoc, propter hoc, I just didn't feel the need to go into the long list of explaination. So I will keep it up.
-Staks __________________________________________________ |
DangerousTalk ::: Favorites 2007-02-13 20:20:03
this was a response to a particular person with which I had a lengthy back and forth discussion with through both video and e-mail. I will review the video again and may take it down if it has no further use. __________________________________________________ |
yadsik ::: Favorites 2007-02-13 18:14:39
Mr. Dangerous talk, I understand where you are coming from, however your argument was a post hoc ergo procter hoc and not valid, I realised this before listingriffin pointed it out, it was quite obvious. Again in this video you use the same pos hoc ergo procter hocs as well as other ones, I suggest writing a script next time and sending it to an edit group. __________________________________________________ |
retrognostic ::: Favorites 2007-02-05 21:45:41
it doesn't preach hate its history shitty things happened in the past and since divine inspiration is nothing more than a voice in your head some people got it wrong and without religion no societies would have ever gotton started wheter it was Zeus, Odin, Ba'al what ever it made people get together and take away insecurities and why because we needed it and some still do. I don't need it but I do believe it __________________________________________________ |
DangerousTalk ::: Favorites 2007-02-05 17:32:14
I could be wrong, but aren't Catholics Christians? Aren't Gnostics Christians too? So, how do you explain away the 80% of the Bible which preachs hate, murder, and horrible atrocities? __________________________________________________ |