 |
Duration: 08:37 minutes Upload Time: 2007-01-26 16:27:06 User: graeme42 :::: Favorites :::: Top Videos of Day |
|
Description: Michael is in Atlantic City to attened to the last meeting of the head of the families but some will die and some won't watch to find out who dies or who lives. |
|
Comments | |
| graeme42 ::: Favorites none of the godfathers r basied in the 1929's 07-10-12 11:26:16 __________________________________________________ | |
| baruavice ::: Favorites i dont know what jackshit you guys are talkin about .. i equally praise this films to GF 1 and 2 . This movie releases emotion like no other , and Sofia Coppola's acting was indirectely realstic ,displaying the behaviour of teen-adults. 07-10-12 04:03:21 __________________________________________________ | |
| giantman121 ::: Favorites The Godfather movie dies with this movie involviong helicopeters, cars, big buildings, and everything not in the 1929's. 07-10-12 02:31:24 __________________________________________________ | |
| ybybz ::: Favorites part 1 is the best part 3 sucks,there isnt much bout the mafia and pacino's son doesnt become the don thats stupid,they dont tell u what happens to tom,or clemanza and lots of other people. they dont show what happened with the corleone family,they act like there is no compound thats stupid 07-09-23 00:16:53 __________________________________________________ | |
| AnakinSkywalker546 ::: Favorites it happened again! The orange is the sign of death in the godfather and an orange rolled towards that guy right before they were attacked 07-09-16 20:35:55 __________________________________________________ | |
| TwilightDrop ::: Favorites And another thing I don't disagree aboutthe story was the abscence of Tom Hagen....All the great supporting characters were not in the 3rd film..Sure, Brando's, Cann, and the character of Fredo were dead, but damn!!.....Duval's character was really great, why Frances couldn't pay Duval more too be in the film was completely stupid.. 07-09-03 00:26:44 __________________________________________________ | |
| TwilightDrop ::: Favorites And another thing I don't agree with is Pacino's acting, Pacino in the 70's and early 80's was great, he seemed to play every chracter differently, but when he got older its like he never changed his personality or voice... He played the same guy over and over again, the only thing that changed was the character's names of the parts he was playing... 07-09-03 00:20:10 __________________________________________________ | |
| TwilightDrop ::: Favorites Also, what was good was Michael losing his daughter, it's similiar to Vito losing Sonny,... Bad was Connie being evil, she actualy kills a guy in the film, Connie was always the "Angel" of the family, same as the Mom was, but seeing Connie as bad was odd...This movie should have been made 10 years later than it was.... 07-09-03 00:15:21 __________________________________________________ | |
| TwilightDrop ::: Favorites There are good and bad elemtns to this, one thing I hate is Michael's hairstyle, 2 was Joe Montagna, he was playing funny guy parts around this era, him as a bad guy was weak...Good things were the Story, Sonny's kid Vincent taking over the Corlenone family and becoming Don was good... 07-09-03 00:11:31 __________________________________________________ | |
| Hemloch ::: Favorites part one is good part 2 is better part 3 sucks 07-08-20 18:29:34 __________________________________________________ | |
No comments:
Post a Comment